Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix public_method_defined in presence of prepend #7577

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 12, 2023

Conversation

headius
Copy link
Member

@headius headius commented Jan 12, 2023

When we check public_method_defined with no parent search on a prepended class, we go to the location of the class's original methods (methodLocation in JRuby) and do the lookup there. This does find the method, but the original logic then rejected it if the methodLocation was not where the method was originally defined (which of course, it wasn't since the method was originally defined on the non-prepended class). The fix here uses the CacheEntry source module, which should match the new prepended location of the original class's methods.

Comparing with the method's defined location causes this to return
UNDEFINED since the original definition location would be the
unprepended origin class, not matching the new method location
after prepending.

Fixes jruby#7545
Since jruby#6164 was filed, we started setting jit.background=false
whenever jit.threshold=0, since the intent is that all methods
JIT before executing. This prevents us failing the deprecated
constant test because we no longer cache once in interpreter and
again in JIT. It does not fix the issue that when transitiong to
JIT code we will recache constants and other values so jruby#6164 is
still an issue (if it is really an issue).
@headius headius added this to the JRuby 9.3.10.0 milestone Jan 12, 2023
@headius headius merged commit 60f5e79 into jruby:jruby-9.3 Jan 12, 2023
@headius headius deleted the super_method_in_metaclass branch January 12, 2023 19:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant