Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

scribe-tool license? #2

Closed
BigBlueHat opened this issue Apr 17, 2018 · 8 comments
Closed

scribe-tool license? #2

BigBlueHat opened this issue Apr 17, 2018 · 8 comments
Assignees

Comments

@BigBlueHat
Copy link
Member

This mostly looks like the work of one, @gkellogg. 馃槈

It'd be great to get a license on this and possibly even (eventually) give it's own repo and distribute it via npm (all of which I'd be happy to help with).

For now, though, it'd be great to http://choosealicense.org/ 馃槃

Thanks!
馃帺

@gkellogg
Copy link
Member

Actually, it鈥檚 Manu鈥檚 tool that I鈥檝e tweeked a bit. Takes some handholding, but has some nice features.

@gkellogg
Copy link
Member

@msporny, care to opine?

@gkellogg
Copy link
Member

Perhaps the W3C Software and Document License would cover it:

All documents in this Repository are licensed by contributors under the W3C Software and Document License.

It was copied from https://github.com/opencreds/minutes/blob/master/LICENSE, so that may be the one to use. It's @msporny's creation, so he decides.

@msporny
Copy link
Member

msporny commented Apr 17, 2018

It was/is CC-0... 3-clause BSD is fine as well. I'd rather not do W3C SDL.

If either of you don't like CC-0, let's do 3-clause BSD.

@BigBlueHat
Copy link
Member Author

@msporny does/did it have it's own repo? It'd be nice to just pull the tool in via package.json (vs. maintaining code with the archives)--and obviously I'd tweak the code to use templates per-the local repo or some such. 馃槃

License choices are of course fine, though I'm curious (tangentially) why not the W3C SDL (but totally fine if this code is not under that license).

@BigBlueHat
Copy link
Member Author

And, if we get scrawl it's own repo, I'll make PRs to this one and opencreds to get them using a package.json originated scrawl command line thingie.

Cheers!
馃帺

@msporny
Copy link
Member

msporny commented Apr 17, 2018

@msporny does/did it have it's own repo?

Yes, it has 3! (note that the W3C CCG also uses the tool)

It'd be nice to just pull the tool in via package.json (vs. maintaining code with the archives)--and obviously I'd tweak the code to use templates per-the local repo or some such.

Yeah, that'd be nice. It has been a constant work in progress over the past decade or so. Note instructions on using it:

https://github.com/w3c-ccg/w3c-ccg.github.io/blob/master/irc_ref.md#publishing-the-minutes

It's a part of a larger system... :)

Also note that there is live editor here where you can drop an IRC log into, clean it up, and see live changes as you make changes:

https://w3c-ccg.github.io/meetings/scribe-tool/

For example, drop the text of this IRC log into the text box at the link above:

https://w3c-ccg.github.io/meetings/2018-03-20/irc.log

License choices are of course fine, though I'm curious (tangentially) why not the W3C SDL (but totally fine if this code is not under that license).

My expectation is that developers don't know CC-0 and W3C SDL well enough to feel comfortable with it, thus will feel more comfortable contributing to the 3-clause BSD license.

@BigBlueHat
Copy link
Member Author

@msporny works for me!

gkellogg added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 17, 2018
@gkellogg gkellogg mentioned this issue Apr 17, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants