Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow rbd mirroring mode to be set to none #596

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: stable/21.04
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

wolsen
Copy link
Collaborator

@wolsen wolsen commented Apr 9, 2021

Allow the rbd-mirroring-mode for a Ceph pool to be specified as
'none'. This allows a charm to be able to explicitly disable rbd
mirroring when it knows it will be creating a pool type which is
not supported.

The example for this, is when erasure coded pools are being created
for RBD use. Two pools are created, one for erasure coded data and
one for RBD metadata. Neither pool should be mirrored, so the charm
can explicitly specify this.

Closes-Bug: #1898504
(cherry picked from commit c3bd490)

Allow the rbd-mirroring-mode for a Ceph pool to be specified as
'none'. This allows a charm to be able to explicitly disable rbd
mirroring when it knows it will be creating a pool type which is
not supported.

The example for this, is when erasure coded pools are being created
for RBD use. Two pools are created, one for erasure coded data and
one for RBD metadata. Neither pool should be mirrored, so the charm
can explicitly specify this.

Closes-Bug: #1898504
(cherry picked from commit c3bd490)
@ajkavanagh
Copy link
Contributor

H @wolsen what's the status of this change, please? It's targeted against stable/21.04 which is now EOL (due to charmhub migration), and thus I was wondering if we can close it? Also the associated gerrit review at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/charm-cinder-ceph/+/784871 and the bug at https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-ceph-rbd-mirror/+bug/1898504? Thanks!

@ajkavanagh ajkavanagh added the stale Nobody has touched anything in quite a while; probably abandoned or forgotten. label Jun 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
stale Nobody has touched anything in quite a while; probably abandoned or forgotten.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants