You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Julia v0.7 has much improved support for broadcasting, for example, one can now more easily capture complex function calls like exp.( log.(x .+ 1) .+ 2)). We can exploit this for domains: if d is a domain then ``exp.( log.(d .+ 1) .+ 2))` should be the mapped domain, and we can capture each function call and turn it into a composition of maps.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We have largely achieved this with #61, though more could be done. However, DomainSets has no knowledge of measures, so the interval exp.(0..1) would just be another interval 1..exp(1). There would not be a need to store the map. On the other hand, it is not possible to generically determine what a function maps a domain to, unless the function is known to be uniquely invertible.
The new maps in #61 do support jacobians, because they are convenient to have, but I don't think there is a use for them in DomainSets. I've introduced measures in DomainIntegrals.jl and a change of variables there does make use of the jacobian functionality in DomainSets.jl. There might be room for a FunctionMeasures package or something like that.
Julia v0.7 has much improved support for broadcasting, for example, one can now more easily capture complex function calls like
exp.( log.(x .+ 1) .+ 2))
. We can exploit this for domains: ifd
is a domain then ``exp.( log.(d .+ 1) .+ 2))` should be the mapped domain, and we can capture each function call and turn it into a composition of maps.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: