-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update HiGHS_jll version #65
Comments
How did you run this? I can't reproduce. julia> using HiGHS_jll
julia> HiGHS_jll.highs() do exe
run(`$(exe) /Users/oscar/Desktop/grid.mps`)
end
Running HiGHS 1.0.0 [date: , git hash: ]
Copyright (c) 2021 ERGO-Code under MIT licence terms
Number of BV entries in BOUNDS section is 145
MIP grid has 429 rows; 240 cols; 1103 nonzeros; 145 integer variables
Presolving model
178 rows, 213 cols, 669 nonzeros
148 rows, 183 cols, 609 nonzeros
148 rows, 97 cols, 437 nonzeros
148 rows, 97 cols, 437 nonzeros
Solving MIP model with:
148 rows
97 cols (88 binary, 0 integer, 0 implied int., 9 continuous)
437 nonzeros
( 0.0s) Starting symmetry detection
( 0.0s) Found 1 generators
Solving root node LP relaxation
Nodes | B&B Tree | Objective Bounds | Dynamic Constraints | Work
Proc. InQueue | Leaves Expl. | BestBound BestSol Gap | Cuts InLp Confl. | LpIters Time
0 0 0 0.00% -34.8319908 inf inf 0 0 0 123 0.0s
H 0 0 0 0.00% -33.370549 -31.0353553 7.52% 5811 44 469 761 0.4s
L 0 0 0 0.00% -33.370549 -31.0559017 7.45% 5817 44 496 761 0.5s
L 0 0 0 0.00% -33.370549 -31.0707107 7.40% 5656 28 500 862 0.5s
Solving report
Status Optimal
Primal bound -31.0707106781
Dual bound -31.0707106781
Solution status feasible
-31.0707106781 (objective)
0 (bound viol.)
0 (int. viol.)
0 (row viol.)
Timing 0.70 (total)
0.00 (presolve)
0.00 (postsolve)
Nodes 1
LP iterations 7673 (total)
6454 (strong br.)
638 (separation)
158 (heuristics)
Process(`/Users/oscar/.julia/artifacts/c4849f1d25b1de7712f353e5f1fea57dc665c37a/bin/highs /Users/oscar/Desktop/grid.mps`, ProcessExited(0)) |
I was running in the same environment where I generated the model with JuMP and HiGHS.jl, using HiGHS_jll version = "0.3.2+0" Whereas if I just install HiGHS_jll I get version 0.3.3, and can solve the model with the same results as you. |
Ah, we should update this package then. I guess I forgot to do it. |
Great, thanks for updating! Which branch of JuMP would be the best to test this, I run into version incompatibilities due to the MOI 0.10 requirement? |
Thanks, this is a step forward, the problem can now be solved, but the solver crashes immediately after solving after this error
|
Okay. I probably need to change the C API. It's not as simple as just bumping the JLL. |
I see, thanks for looking into it. HiGHS looks very promising :-) |
Hi, great work on making HiGHS available with Julia and JuMP!
I just learned about the MIP solver in HiGHS and gave it a try, unfortunately it crashed on my test problem:
MPS for the test problem here:
https://gist.github.com/hellemo/7b549f496f7a6ad2803d0e53794c9330
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: