Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About conditioning the discriminator #38

Closed
r06922019 opened this issue Oct 31, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

About conditioning the discriminator #38

r06922019 opened this issue Oct 31, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@r06922019
Copy link

Hi,

In Section 4 Implementation Details

Training details ...
We also find that not conditioning the discriminator D on input A leads to
better results (also discussed in [34]), ...

Does this means that the discriminator has no information to ensure the generated image to be conditioned on image A?
Say we are generating shoes from edges. Being unconditioned on the input image (edges), the discriminator should only be able to tell if the generated shoes are real/fake, but not able to tell if the generated shoes doesn't match the conditions (edge)?
Or some other mechanism is working on the condition part?

Looking forward to your reply, thanks! Nice work!

@junyanz
Copy link
Owner

junyanz commented Nov 1, 2018

We also have the L1 image reconstruction to enforce the correspondence.

@r06922019
Copy link
Author

I see. Thanks for your reply.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants