We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
@ianhi Thanks a lot for the quick fix.
Would you have time to add unit tests on this feature and the one addressed by #824 to reduce potential troubles in the future?
it would make sense to put them in https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab-git/blob/master/tests/model.spec.tsx#L299. I think you could assert internal calls using spy like https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab-git/blob/master/tests/model.spec.tsx#L365.
Originally posted by @fcollonval in #829 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
@ianhi Thanks a lot for the quick fix.
Would you have time to add unit tests on this feature and the one addressed by #824 to reduce potential troubles in the future?
it would make sense to put them in https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab-git/blob/master/tests/model.spec.tsx#L299. I think you could assert internal calls using spy like https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab-git/blob/master/tests/model.spec.tsx#L365.
Originally posted by @fcollonval in #829 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: