Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] Filament Runout script needs tuning #18

Open
cuesir opened this issue Mar 23, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

[BUG] Filament Runout script needs tuning #18

cuesir opened this issue Mar 23, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@cuesir
Copy link

cuesir commented Mar 23, 2022

Did you test the latest bugfix-2.0.x code?

Yes, and the problem still exists.

Bug Description

  1. When it detects filament runout, it tries to unload the filament which might not be good because sometimes the filament is still stuck inside the sensor and you're just asking to break the sensor by forcing the unload automatically. I would rather have it it load a little filament after it moves its head and wait for manual command to unload once its guided by a person.
  2. when it returns to its position, it stays still for about 2-3second ish causing oozing rather than returning to printing immediately once it returns to position like some other printers i've experience.

Bug Timeline

Marlin-2.0.9.3-N2-rc2

Expected behavior

Return to printing immediately to prevent oozing

Actual behavior

Moves to position and pauses for few second causing oozing

Steps to Reproduce

No response

Version of Marlin Firmware

Marlin-2.0.9.3-N2-rc2

Printer model

Ender 3

Electronics

No response

Add-ons

No response

Bed Leveling

No response

Your Slicer

No response

Host Software

No response

Additional information & file uploads

No response

@just-trey
Copy link
Owner

please test again with https://github.com/just-trey/Marlin/releases/tag/2.0.9.3-N2-rc3 I made a change to try and resolve this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants