You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
You say that these last two channels have 2 key-on registers each, one for each group of 2 operators within these channels. Well, what is the order that they appear in?
It could be group-then-channel, or channel-then-group. But this is not specified. The latter allows the expression 0x240 + channel to select the appropriate key-on register for any of the 18 channels (though you need extra logic to write to 0x252 or 0x253 as well in case of channel 16 or 17).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Good point. The key-on registers follow the same order as the operators appear in:
Index
Channel
0x240-0x24f
0 - 15
0x250
16, op 0-1
0x251
16, op 2-3
0x252
17, op 0-1
0x253
17, op 2-3
Maybe there's a clearer way to notate this. You could also number the channels 0 - 19 if you consider the last four channels to be 2-op (but they really aren't).
You say that these last two channels have 2 key-on registers each, one for each group of 2 operators within these channels. Well, what is the order that they appear in?
It could be group-then-channel, or channel-then-group. But this is not specified. The latter allows the expression
0x240 + channel
to select the appropriate key-on register for any of the 18 channels (though you need extra logic to write to0x252
or0x253
as well in case of channel 16 or 17).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: