You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
However, when using 1-channel images (from a MUSE datacube) I get many NaNs for the estimated flux (see bottom image below).
On the contrary, when using coadded 3-channel images (ie adding three wavelength bins along the spectral dimension of thre datacube), I don´t get any NaNs.
Any suggestion why I'm getting NaNs when using the former??? Plots of both images shown below.
Txs vm in advance
Jose
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear Community,
I'd appreciate help on the following issue.
Im doing apperture photometry with direct local background subtraction using the code
flux_lcbkg, fluxerr_lcbkg, flag_lcbkg = sep.sum_circle(datac_c, posx, posy, R, bkgann=(R_in, R_out), subpix=0)
, with R = 6, R_in = 32., R_out = 46. (pixels)
However, when using 1-channel images (from a MUSE datacube) I get many NaNs for the estimated flux (see bottom image below).
On the contrary, when using coadded 3-channel images (ie adding three wavelength bins along the spectral dimension of thre datacube), I don´t get any NaNs.
Any suggestion why I'm getting NaNs when using the former??? Plots of both images shown below.
Txs vm in advance
Jose
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: