-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Focusing of field #6
Comments
Is it correct that you asked if this RCWA is possible to calculate the field using the perfectly matched layer (PML) boundary condition instead of the periodic condition? Or do you mean something else? |
I read a literature review the other day Review The use of plasmonics in light beaming and focusing It was written by Byoungho Lee. The fourth chapter mentioned Beam focusing by surface plasma polarities. The paper mentioned in this overview uses RCWA to calculate the focusing field, which was also written by Byoungho Lee. Then I found that the author of the TORCWA also has Byoungho Lee, so I would like to ask whether the TORCWA can implement the functions mentioned in the previous paper of Byoungho Lee |
The presented figure was performed using the RCWA simulation, but it was performed using a perfectly matched layer (PML) boundary condition. RCWA basically operates under periodic boundary condition, and additional structure must be implemented to operate under PML boundary condition. (There is a formula in H. Kim et al., Fourier modal method and its applications in computational nanophotonics (2012)) Unfortunately, TORCWA currently doesn't have a function to create a structure for such a PML boundary. Therefore, if you want the simulation like presented figure using TORCWA,
Thank you. |
Thank you very much |
Hello,
I want to ask if this RCWA can calculate the focused field instead of the diffracted field?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: