Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Focusing of field #6

Open
huangtingying opened this issue Oct 25, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Focusing of field #6

huangtingying opened this issue Oct 25, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@huangtingying
Copy link

Hello,
I want to ask if this RCWA can calculate the focused field instead of the diffracted field?

@kch3782
Copy link
Owner

kch3782 commented Oct 26, 2022

Is it correct that you asked if this RCWA is possible to calculate the field using the perfectly matched layer (PML) boundary condition instead of the periodic condition? Or do you mean something else?

@huangtingying
Copy link
Author

I read a literature review the other day

Review The use of plasmonics in light beaming and focusing
The-use-of-plasmonics-in-light-beaming-and-f_2010_Progress-in-Quantum-Electr.pdf

It was written by Byoungho Lee. The fourth chapter mentioned Beam focusing by surface plasma polarities. The paper mentioned in this overview uses RCWA to calculate the focusing field, which was also written by Byoungho Lee.
image

image

Then I found that the author of the TORCWA also has Byoungho Lee, so I would like to ask whether the TORCWA can implement the functions mentioned in the previous paper of Byoungho Lee

@kch3782
Copy link
Owner

kch3782 commented Oct 27, 2022

The presented figure was performed using the RCWA simulation, but it was performed using a perfectly matched layer (PML) boundary condition. RCWA basically operates under periodic boundary condition, and additional structure must be implemented to operate under PML boundary condition. (There is a formula in H. Kim et al., Fourier modal method and its applications in computational nanophotonics (2012)) Unfortunately, TORCWA currently doesn't have a function to create a structure for such a PML boundary.

Therefore, if you want the simulation like presented figure using TORCWA,

  1. Directly implements the function that makes the PML boundary condition in the referenced book, or
  2. Increasing the period to reduce the periodic effect, but it is less accurate and takes longer time to calculate.

Thank you.

@huangtingying
Copy link
Author

Thank you very much

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants