Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Poll] Does Keel need a new website? #129

Closed
rusenask opened this issue Jan 3, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

[Poll] Does Keel need a new website? #129

rusenask opened this issue Jan 3, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@rusenask
Copy link
Collaborator

rusenask commented Jan 3, 2018

Hi everyone,

As Keel progressed with features and configuration, our current website https://keel.sh is probably not the easiest place to navigate around.

I am considering to rebuild it based on my other project's website available here: https://webhookrelay.com/. Left side menu should help split installation and configuration guides into different sections.


@RXminuS
Copy link

RXminuS commented Feb 11, 2018

I actually think the website is fine but the guides aren't very good. Need more examples, I'd write them myself but I'm still strugling to figure out how it all works. Maybe focus on content first and styling later?

@rusenask
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Yes, I think the main problem with the website (at least for me) is that it's not easy to manage content and find something you need. Current layout was nice when it was a landing page with install guide, but once the new features were added and more stuff was moved into "user guide" it became quite difficult to navigate.

Could you tell me your use case, what are you trying to achieve? One of the closest things to how-to tutorial that I wrote is here: https://medium.com/@karolis.rusenas/run-your-service-like-a-drug-lord-6136ed35c019. I am in the process of rewriting it and making it more generic and easy to understand where Keel fits in.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants