Naming conflicts

[jcelerier]

Seriously, everybody on earth and maybe up to the international space station uses the terms "Modern C++" for C++11 / C++14.

e.g. Effective Modern C++, etc... http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033707.do

There is also "Modern C++ and Windows Store" that already has a foot hold in the Windows-specific world : http://www.amazon.fr/Modern-C-Windows-Store-Apps/dp/0989020800/ref=sr_1_5?s=english-books&ie=UTF8&qid=1438185205&sr=1-5&keywords=modern+c%2B%2B

[kennykerr]

That’s why it’s called "Modern C++ for the Windows Runtime". There's only one standard C++ language projection for the Windows Runtime and this is it.

Plus naming is hard. 😊