Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Enhancement]: Add support for HST STIS #666

Open
1 task done
andreok opened this issue Jun 23, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
1 task done

[Enhancement]: Add support for HST STIS #666

andreok opened this issue Jun 23, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request future work This issue is better tackled later (e.g. once we have real data)

Comments

@andreok
Copy link

andreok commented Jun 23, 2024

What is your suggestion?

It would be really helpful if Eureka! could provide a demo on how to reduce and fit data from HST STIS G430L and G750L observations.

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
@andreok andreok added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 23, 2024
@taylorbell57
Copy link
Collaborator

@kevin218, you're far more experienced with HST than I - how much work do you think it'd take to add support for HST/STIS? I seem to recall there being STIS support in POET, but maybe that was just WFC3 UVIS. To support STIS, do you figure we could largely repurpose POET or Eureka! code? I know detrending of the two instruments is fairly different and would presumably require some additional systematic models, but I'm not sure what differences there would need to be during reduction

@taylorbell57 taylorbell57 changed the title [Enhancement]: Add support for HST STISS [Enhancement]: Add support for HST STIS Jun 23, 2024
@kevin218
Copy link
Owner

I have never reduced STIS data, but we have an internal proposal in to do just that. If it gets selected, then we'll do the work.

@taylorbell57 taylorbell57 added the future work This issue is better tackled later (e.g. once we have real data) label Jun 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request future work This issue is better tackled later (e.g. once we have real data)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants