Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why so big difference among different compressor and platforms? #4

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Jan 12, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

two apks with elsim, results as following:
1 elsim.exe in windows
warning: compressor SNAPPY is not supported (use zlib default compressor)
Elements:
     IDENTICAL: 1408
     SIMILAR:   514
     NEW:       76
     DELETED:   1
     SKIPPED:   0
warning: compressor SNAPPY is not supported (use zlib default compressor)
    --> methods: 92.890752% of similarities

2 elsim in linux with snappy
Elements:
     IDENTICAL: 1408
     SIMILAR:   437
     NEW:       64
     DELETED:   78
     SKIPPED:   0
    --> methods: 91.919089% of similarities

3 elsim in linux with ZLIB
Elements:
     IDENTICAL: 1408
     SIMILAR:   484
     NEW:       40
     DELETED:   31
     SKIPPED:   0
    --> methods: 92.338823% of similarities

4 elsim in linux with BZ2
Elements:
     IDENTICAL: 1408
     SIMILAR:   502
     NEW:       43
     DELETED:   13
     SKIPPED:   0
    --> methods: 91.555399% of similarities

because the two apks are similar but one is obfuscated in code.
so seems the windows elsim.exe with zlib is a best result.

Why? Why 1 and 3 different since both use zlib? 

Original issue reported on code.google.com by lingtong...@gmail.com on 17 Jul 2013 at 4:38

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant