You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since the first stage sampler allows for passing positive and negative prompts, why not allow the user to write these prompts instead of leaving them blank (which probably induces a bias in fact)?
I don't know if it would have a lot of influence on the result but it could probably slightly help handling different textures better, for instance by prompting "skin texture" for portraits and "tree, leaves" for forest landscapes.
However I do understand that adding another two parameters that probably are not that useful could lead to a heavier node so you might have done that by design.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Since the first stage sampler allows for passing positive and negative prompts, why not allow the user to write these prompts instead of leaving them blank (which probably induces a bias in fact)?
I don't know if it would have a lot of influence on the result but it could probably slightly help handling different textures better, for instance by prompting "skin texture" for portraits and "tree, leaves" for forest landscapes.
However I do understand that adding another two parameters that probably are not that useful could lead to a heavier node so you might have done that by design.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: