You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was wondering, if it would be possible to use the library under the terms of the LGPL instead of the GPL for open source projects.
Trouble is, that I don't want to use GPL, but more like BSD as a license for my stuff and I'm worried, that I had to relicense the code according to GPL when using this library. Thus, I'm trying to find out, if dynamic linking and LGPL would work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
oleid
changed the title
[license] Consider switching to LGPL
[license] [question] Consider switching to LGPL
Jun 27, 2018
I am not in a position to relax licensing terms of the whole lbzip2 software project as I am not the only author (copyright holder). However I am willing to allow use of parts of lbzip2 code of which I am the only author under a different free software license, such as LGPL.
I was wondering, if it would be possible to use the library under the terms of the LGPL instead of the GPL for open source projects.
Trouble is, that I don't want to use GPL, but more like BSD as a license for my stuff and I'm worried, that I had to relicense the code according to GPL when using this library. Thus, I'm trying to find out, if dynamic linking and LGPL would work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: