Shrink repository

[gwenn]

There seems to be something wrong:

$ git clone https://github.com/kkawakam/rustyline
Cloning into 'kkawakam-rustyline'...
remote: Counting objects: 125450, done.
remote: Total 125450 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 125450
Receiving objects: 100% (125450/125450), 39.23 MiB | 4.30 MiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (120354/120354), done.
$ cd rustyline
$ du -h -d 1
 43M	./.git
4.0K	./examples
144K	./src
 43M	.

It seems that some html/javascript files haven been added/commited.
Using the script described here

All sizes are in kB. The pack column is the size of the object, compressed, inside the pack file.
-e    size  pack                                      SHA                                              location
1158  102   ac022cdad0792d6b5a92443591a4a13447dd2f61  src/libc/lib.rs.html
889   156   18fb8e7d017939a7866d770f2f128dcf06f982cb  search-index.js
561   25    05cc9269d38aa0db6623f9f10e622ec3afad2870  nix/sys/ioctl/libc/index.html
364   57    67285d0679fe8741691acfff97c6223f7baadd64  search-index.js
337   10    35865ffd48354a252b1b9623af51e7b912934f4a  bitflags/__core/prelude/v1/trait.PartialEq.html
268   25    10323005747653adee46df009b7abf73c9d728ef  bitflags/__core/prelude/v1/struct.Vec.html
261   13    94a89fd9eac872d1468b183ad64168d6df682e7e  nix/sys/ioctl/libc/index.html
250   21    03df2507089f9edf622152bab56a4355d54d143d  bitflags/__core/prelude/v1/trait.Iterator.html
235   29    e44dca71087bbbaeca108a13aa1160a1fd80baf2  bitflags/__core/prelude/v1/struct.String.html
233   25    3216db156c7d32d82655051fce4b1039c79a029e  src/nix/errno.rs.html

Would you mind trying to cleanup this stuff ?
Thanks.

[jwilm]

I agree, this repository is quite large.

Looks like the gh-pages branch is the cause of most of this. Maybe it can just be removed now that docs.rs is providing online docs?

[kkawakam]

Sorry for being MIA and I'll remove the gh-pages. I originally thought it might be useful in providing the docs for what is currently in master but I didn't think about how it would bloat the repo.

[jwilm]

Sounds good! Thanks for this project btw. Really easy to use and get started with. I'm using it at work :).

[jonas-schievink]

Another option would be to make the deploy script force-push a single commit to the branch. That way, the entire history doesn't get saved, just the current state of the docs.