Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase webhook resources & skip TestUpdate to reduce test flakes #8048

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 23, 2020

Conversation

tcnghia
Copy link
Contributor

@tcnghia tcnghia commented May 23, 2020

Fixes #

Proposed Changes

  • Increase webhook resources to attempt to reduce webhook timeout test flakes
  • Skip flaky TestUpdate. We don't want to just do t.Skip() since the test may still be useful for net-* repositories. I opened TestUpdate is very flaky, needs investigation #8032 to track the work of fixing this test.

Release Note

NONE

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. label May 23, 2020
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels May 23, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tcnghia: 0 warnings.

In response to this:

Fixes #

Proposed Changes

Release Note

NONE

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the area/test-and-release It flags unit/e2e/conformance/perf test issues for product features label May 23, 2020
@tcnghia tcnghia changed the title Increase webhook resources to attempt to reduce test flakes Increase webhook resources to attempt to reduce webhook timeout test flakes May 23, 2020
@tcnghia tcnghia force-pushed the increase-webhook-resources branch from a3d08ab to d30b3a3 Compare May 23, 2020 01:49
@tcnghia tcnghia force-pushed the increase-webhook-resources branch from d30b3a3 to 8a1ea7c Compare May 23, 2020 01:53
Copy link
Contributor

@vagababov vagababov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's try this
/lgtm

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 23, 2020
@tcnghia
Copy link
Contributor Author

tcnghia commented May 23, 2020

/hold

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 23, 2020
@tcnghia
Copy link
Contributor Author

tcnghia commented May 23, 2020

/test pull-knative-serving-integration-tests

@tcnghia
Copy link
Contributor Author

tcnghia commented May 23, 2020

(all previous 3 runs were failing TestUpdate)

@tcnghia
Copy link
Contributor Author

tcnghia commented May 23, 2020

/hold cancel

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 23, 2020
@tcnghia
Copy link
Contributor Author

tcnghia commented May 23, 2020

/test pull-knative-serving-integration-tests

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 23, 2020
@knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: tcnghia

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 23, 2020
@tcnghia tcnghia changed the title Increase webhook resources to attempt to reduce webhook timeout test flakes Increase webhook resources & skip TestUpdate to reduce test flakes May 23, 2020
test/e2e-tests.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@tcnghia tcnghia force-pushed the increase-webhook-resources branch from 0263e4f to 465a6e3 Compare May 23, 2020 06:02
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 23, 2020
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 23, 2020
@knative-test-reporter-robot

The following jobs failed:

Test name Triggers Retries
pull-knative-serving-integration-tests pull-knative-serving-integration-tests
pull-knative-serving-integration-tests
2/3

Automatically retrying due to test flakiness...
/test pull-knative-serving-integration-tests

@vagababov
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/hold
let's see how they pass :)

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels May 23, 2020
@tcnghia
Copy link
Contributor Author

tcnghia commented May 23, 2020

looks like passing
/hold cancel

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 23, 2020
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot merged commit ed4d688 into knative:master May 23, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/test-and-release It flags unit/e2e/conformance/perf test issues for product features cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants