New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add warning when using .returning() in sqlite3. Fixes #1660 #2471
Add warning when using .returning() in sqlite3. Fixes #1660 #2471
Conversation
hmm.. for some reason some tape oracle tests are running with older nodes, which shouldn't even test for oracle (node-oracledb driver stopped providing binaries for older node versions). I've never seen those fails before... trying to rerun |
@elhigu Yeah been trying to rerun these the past two hours. It doesn't make much sense :/ |
Maybe they have again done some changes or something in the driver which breaks the tests. If you don't have hurry with this. I can figure out the cause of breakage during next week. Probably all the other new PRs will be failing too. |
Node 5 and 7 should not be running oracle tests at all, because driver couldn't be installed there anymore. But 4 and 6 were still supposed to be supported while ago. |
Oracle says that it should support node 4,6,8,9 so that self.destory() sounds like node-oracledb bug. Good catch 👍 |
I created an issue oracle/node-oracledb#847 |
Meanwhile if tests are passing and only error are those oracle ones, we can merge there PRs |
Is there some way to disable this warning? It clutters the terminal quite a bit while seeding and debugging and makes it impossible to read anything else during development. Currently just commented it out in the |
At least it is possible by not using |
Yeah, that would be great to hook something like winston up. Was just wondering why that message spammed my screen as I am not calling that method. (maybe objection or bookshelf do) |
yeah probably objection and bookshelf are using that and both libs are probably using it correctly 👍 |
I've been burned by both winston and bunyan showstopper bugs--please don't pull either of those in as deps. I don't feel that requiring users to Would it be OK to only omit the warning once? Another solution, could you not omit the warning at all if, say, the |
I much rather merge the WIP branch by @tgriesser if he feels that it is done. I don't like adding temporary deviations. |
No description provided.