-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ILM Policy variable conflicts with ILM Policies #84
Comments
Would you mind to create an PR with a fix? |
I am also having troubles with ILM enabled policy fluentd-elastisearch tag: 3.2.0 image and version: 11.7.2 of helm chart.
Error what I am getting after enabling ILM: I have checked if the xpack is installed and after i search for gem of xpack i can see it in the fluentd-elasticsearch container. Also when I check if elasticsearch has working xpack all seems good. |
We can enable ILM with template like this
*Note: you need to edit your Policy and disable Rollover at Hot phase, why? by default fluentd index pattern start with logstash-%Y.%m.%d and rollover_alias cannot use pattern like that |
Describe the bug
When ILM is enabled, the fluentd pod goes into a crash loop because both ILM_POLICY and ILM_POLICIES are enabled even though the ILM_POLICIES is an empty map. Only one of the variables should actually be defined.
Version of Helm and Kubernetes:
Helm Version: 3.5.2
Kubernetes Version: 1.18.7
Which version of the chart: 11.13.0
What happened: Deployment fails due to Pod in crash loop. Two conflicting variables are defined instead of one.
What you expected to happen: I should be able to enable ILM and chose either to provide a policy definition or an existing policy name
How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible): Set ilm.enabled to true
<~--
This could be something like:
values.yaml (only put values which differ from the defaults)
-->
Anything else we need to know:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: