You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
=FOR and FOR: I will send a pull request replacing =FOR with =TO
human and person are both defined as man/659, this is OK in 4lang. This is a bad property of this 44-element DV, but such sub-optimalities may appear as the problem is NP-hard.
permit is defined as allow, which in turn is defined with more basic elements (=AGT SAY =DAT[=PAT[can/1246]], say CAUSE =DAT[=PAT[can/1246]]) this is also OK
=agt, =at, =dat, =for, =from, =obl, =pat, =poss, =rel, =to, all, also, an, angry, before, can/1246, cause, characteristic, color, country, er, female, food, for, has, human, identity, inherent, is_a, lack, male, monk, next_to, not, number, or, other, part_of, person, real, round, speak, target, want
The duplication is between =for and for, both of which appear in several places.
Also suspicious: human/person (they have the same definition, just like permit/allow,
but the current algorithm doesn't prune these well).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: