-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Memory leak #70
Comments
I'm lost. My 10.15.5 Mac is currently at 588a1ff, and it passes all the regression tests. I backed up the 10.14.6 machine to that same commit, and it fails. I completely deleted my clone on the 10.14 machine and started over, it still fails. I honestly can't tell you when the 10.14 machine last passed the tests, if it built on the 10.15 machine and passed, I have been just building it and installing it and not running the regression tests. My bad. The 10.14 machine is using ksh93u+m as the shell, the 10.15 machine is not, it's using 93u+. But that should not make any difference, right? Edit: No, reverting to 93u+ as $SHELL on the 10.14 machine didn't change anything. |
Ok, someone smarter than me is going to have to explain this one. On the 10.15 machine...
ssh'd to the 10.15 machine from the 10.14 machine...
Same git repo (physically!), commit 588a1ff. EDIT: I just tried copying the repository from the 10.15 machine to the 10.14 machine. The same compiled binary fails the test on the 10.14 machine. |
More ridiculousness... I deleted the repo on the 10.14 machine, and re-cloned from HEAD. Built it. Got the memory leak. Then I ssh'd to the 10.14 machine from the 10.15 machine, ran the test again, and it PASSED. /me very confused. |
Hrm. I can't reproduce any failure on my end. We can be pretty confident it's not a leak in I've no idea why these random minor variations occur, but all the leak tests are repeated in loops to make the leak significantly large if there is one, so I'll just have to program in some tolerance, I guess – maybe 128 bytes? Thanks for the report in any case. |
The problem is back, built from HEAD on 10.15.6.
|
but...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: