Setup KF Model Registry GH tests

[lampajr]

Which issue is resolved by this Pull Request:
Resolves #

Followup of #2631

Description of your changes:

Add GH test for Kubeflow Model Registry component.

Checklist:

• Unit tests pass:
  Make sure you have installed kustomize == 5.2.1+
  1. make generate-changed-only
  2. make test

[google-oss-prow]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lampajr
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign kimwnasptd for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[lampajr]

Note that at the moment there is no apps/model-registry/upstream content.

Do you want to add that from main or v0.2.0-alpha branch tag?

[lampajr]

fyi @tarilabs @rimolive

[tarilabs]

Do you want to add that from main or v0.2.0-alpha branch?

I believe it will be meaningful to start tracking https://github.com/kubeflow/model-registry/releases/tag/v0.2.0-alpha
let me know if you need a proper branch or tag is sufficient like atm

[lampajr]

I believe it will be meaningful to start tracking https://github.com/kubeflow/model-registry/releases/tag/v0.2.0-alpha

+1, if we all agree on that I will add the content as part of this PR

let me know if you need a proper branch or tag is sufficient like atm

The script to sync the manifest requires a generic git ref, therefore the tag is absolutely fine.

[tarilabs]

/lgtm thanks @lampajr

[rimolive]

/lgtm

cc @juliusvonkohout

[rimolive]

@lampajr Thank you for your contribution! After discussing with Manifests WG leads we decided to cherry-pick the functional tests in #2697 so we add the manifest and run the tests.

Looking for your ack so I can close this PR in favor of #2697.

[lampajr]

@lampajr Thank you for your contribution! After discussing with Manifests WG leads we decided to cherry-pick the functional tests in #2697 so we add the manifest and run the tests.

Looking for your ack so I can close this PR in favor of #2697.

That's fine for me, thanks @rimolive !

[lampajr]

Closing this in favor of #2697