Fix error when conditions is empty.

[Corea]

No description provided.

[kubeflow-bot]

This change is 

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @Corea. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubeflow member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[gaocegege]

/lgtm
/assign @jinchihe

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 96.667% when pulling 2feed83 on Corea:master into 394a7da on kubeflow:master.

[Corea]

I also fixed the same errors on other files. @gaocegege

[jinchihe]

@Corea Thanks. Would you please append the error when the conditions is empty? I think for now, the code will return [] if the conditions is empty. Thanks.

[gaocegege]

/ok-to-test

[k8s-ci-robot]

@Corea: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Rerun command
kubeflow-tf-operator-presubmit	2feed83	link	/test kubeflow-tf-operator-presubmit

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[jinchihe]

@Corea The CI problem already fixed, would you please rebase?

[Corea]

@Corea Thanks. Would you please append the error when the conditions is empty? I think for now, the code will return [] if the conditions is empty. Thanks.

TF Job doesn't have any information about status or condition sometimes, especially just after TF Job started, so the code should return [] or wait for complete information. How do you think?

@Corea The CI problem already fixed, would you please rebase?

Okay, I'll do it at the end!

[gaocegege]

Hi, any update here?

[Corea]

Could you answer my question? @jinchihe

[jinchihe]

@Corea I'm OK.

/lgtm
/approve

[gaocegege]

/approve

Thanks for your contribution! 🎉 👍

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Corea, gaocegege, jinchihe

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [gaocegege]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment