Fix call order in the SSH key view

[maciaszczykm]

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #2564

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

Fix loading of the access rights in the SSH keys view.

[kubermatic-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: maciaszczykm

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [maciaszczykm]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[maciaszczykm]

/assign @kgroschoff

[maciaszczykm]

/cherrypick release/v2.15

[kubermatic-bot]

@maciaszczykm: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release/v2.15 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherrypick release/v2.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #2645 into master will decrease coverage by 0.23%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2645      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   52.47%   52.23%   -0.24%     
==========================================
  Files         234      234              
  Lines        8191     8372     +181     
  Branches      998     1023      +25     
==========================================
+ Hits         4298     4373      +75     
- Misses       3890     3995     +105     
- Partials        3        4       +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/app/sshkey/sshkey.component.ts	74.72% <100.00%> (-0.28%)	⬇️
...error-notifications/error-notifications.service.ts	27.58% <0.00%> (-7.42%)	⬇️
src/app/core/services/params/params.service.ts	50.00% <0.00%> (-4.17%)	⬇️
src/app/testing/services/settings-mock.service.ts	78.57% <0.00%> (-3.25%)	⬇️
src/app/core/services/cluster/cluster.service.ts	15.34% <0.00%> (-2.52%)	⬇️
...t/edit-addon-dialog/edit-addon-dialog.component.ts	31.11% <0.00%> (-2.23%)	⬇️
...all-addon-dialog/install-addon-dialog.component.ts	22.41% <0.00%> (-1.83%)	⬇️
...app/cluster/cluster-list/cluster-list.component.ts	64.97% <0.00%> (-1.70%)	⬇️
...d-machine-network/add-machine-network.component.ts	61.90% <0.00%> (-0.89%)	⬇️
src/app/project/project.module.ts	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 4 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2e543d5...4985674. Read the comment docs.

[maciaszczykm]

/retest

[kgroschoff]

I'm still able to see the ssh keys, but not to add a new one. Is this meant by User with viewer role sees ssh key management as not greyed out in ui?
Asking because when the whole user management was added, this was the requested behaviour: "sshkeys": {"view": true, "edit": false, "create": false, "delete": false}. We obviously could change that. Just wondering about the issue 😅

Apart from that, code looks good

[maciaszczykm]

Is this meant by User with viewer role sees ssh key management as not greyed out in ui?

Yes, I think so. The view rights are here and backend also supports them. Only the add, edit and delete should be blocked and it wasn't working because of wrong initialization.

[kgroschoff]

/lgtm

[kubermatic-bot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 0a5d5e8d491da1965475a980b9ee67f73f9bb767

[kubermatic-triage-bot]

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs

Review the full test history

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

Also, here is a cat.
/meow

[kubermatic-bot]

@kubermatic-triage-bot:

In response to this:

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs

Review the full test history

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

Also, here is a cat.
/meow

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[kubermatic-triage-bot]

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs

Review the full test history

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

Also, here is a cat.
/meow

[kubermatic-bot]

@kubermatic-triage-bot:

In response to this:

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs

Review the full test history

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

Also, here is a cat.
/meow

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[kubermatic-bot]

@maciaszczykm: new pull request created: #2649

In response to this:

/cherrypick release/v2.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.