New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
node: cpumanager: add options to reject non SMT-aligned workload #2625
Comments
/sig node |
/stage alpha |
The enhancement kubernetes/enhancements#2625 want to add a new kubelet option to fine tune the behaviour of the cpu manager policies, and to do so we add support for cpu manager policy options themselves. Signed-off-by: Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com>
The enhancement kubernetes/enhancements#2625 want to add a new kubelet option to fine tune the behaviour of the cpu manager policies, and to do so we add support for cpu manager policy options themselves. Signed-off-by: Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com>
Hi @fromanirh 👋 1.22 Enhancement shadow here. This enhancement is in good shape, some minor change requests in light of Enhancement Freeze on Thursday May 13th:
Thank you 😊 |
See: kubernetes#2625 (comment) Signed-off-by: Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com>
Done! thanks for checking! |
fixed the issue summary to make it consistent with the KEP |
Hi @fromanirh 👋 1.22 Enhancements shadow here. |
Hi @gracenng ! thanks for checking in! I'm waiting for another review indeed. sig-node ack'd this enhancement (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U10J0WwgWXkdYrqWGGvO8iH2HKeerQAlygnqgDgWv4E/edit#heading=h.y6vnh39j4mih) but unfortunately the sig is a bit overworked. I'll update as soon as possible. |
The enhancement kubernetes/enhancements#2625 want to add a new kubelet option to fine tune the behaviour of the cpu manager policies, and to do so we add support for cpu manager policy options themselves. Signed-off-by: Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com>
The enhancement kubernetes/enhancements#2625 want to add a new kubelet option to fine tune the behaviour of the cpu manager policies, and to do so we add support for cpu manager policy options themselves. Signed-off-by: Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com>
Hi @fromanirh 🌞 1.22 enhancements shadow here. In light of Code Freeze on July 8th, this enhancement current status is at risk as kubernetes/kubernetes#101432 has not been merged. Thanks |
Hi @fromanirh, 1.22 enhancements shadow here. Friendly reminder that Code Freeze is tomorrow, July 8th. Feel free to ping me once its merged. |
Hi Grace, thanks for the reminder. I'm working towards the final round of review. |
The enhancement kubernetes/enhancements#2625 want to add a new kubelet option to fine tune the behaviour of the cpu manager policies, and to do so we add support for cpu manager policy options themselves. Signed-off-by: Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com>
Please note that (of course once the implementation merges) we are planning to go beta not before two releases. So, if the implementation merges in 1.22, we will not promote to beta before 1.24 (was 1.23 before) |
@gracenng this issue is still having the label "tracked/no". Is it expected? |
Hi, thanks for letting me know, looking into it Edit: updated |
Graduating CPU Manager Policy Options 1.23 Beta :
Related:
All PRs merged! |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
/remove-lifecycle rotten |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
@ffromani is this going to be worked on in 1.28? |
Enhancement Description
Add options to cpumanager policies to allow finer grained thread allocation
k/enhancements
) update PR(s): node: cpumanager: add options to reject non SMT-aligned workload #2626k/k
) update PR(s): node: cpumanager: add options to reject non SMT-aligned workload kubernetes#101432k/website
) update PR(s): cpumanager: document cpu manager policy options website#27891The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: