-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Automated cherry pick of #100678: apf: exempt probes /healthz /livez /readyz #101111
Automated cherry pick of #100678: apf: exempt probes /healthz /livez /readyz #101111
Conversation
/kind bug |
/lgtm @deads2k - FYI |
/approve |
1 similar comment
/approve |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: deads2k, hasheddan, lavalamp, tkashem, wojtek-t The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/triage accepted |
Cherry pick of #100678 on release-1.21.
#100678: apf: exempt probes /healthz /livez /readyz
Why we need the back port:
kubelet liveness probe gets a 429 response (the priority level is saturated due to load or degradation) and this may cause kubelet to restart the apiserver instance. This PR will will prevent restarting of "healthy" kube-apiserver instance(s)