New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix KEP link #101138
fix KEP link #101138
Conversation
@zhanghe9702: This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the The Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Hi @zhanghe9702. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: zhanghe9702 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/ok-to-test |
@@ -105,10 +105,10 @@ | |||
link: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blame/master/contributors/devel/sig-architecture/conformance-tests.md#L64 | |||
- endpoint: getFlowcontrolApiserverAPIGroup | |||
reason: depends on alpha feature | |||
link: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/f16c4c7f1c9e28a3cc4bb4d0e6503efea2ae7987/keps/sig-api-machinery/20190228-priority-and-fairness.md | |||
link: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blame/master/contributors/devel/sig-architecture/conformance-tests.md#L64 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
link: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blame/master/contributors/devel/sig-architecture/conformance-tests.md#L64 | |
link: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-api-machinery/1040-priority-and-fairness/README.md |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why this link
This is generated by |
|
|
yes, but this commit modify another file, test/conformance/testdata/ineligible_endpoints.yaml, so? |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /close |
@k8s-triage-robot: Closed this PR. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
fix broken kep link
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #101008
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: