-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dynamic env in subpath - Fixes Issue 48677 #49388
Dynamic env in subpath - Fixes Issue 48677 #49388
Conversation
I commented on #48677. Help me understand the value of this addition. |
You cannot at present use a dynamic env var in subpath. This allows uniqueness of a folder particularly when mutiple pods write the same output such as a log file. You can only achieve the same results with an init container |
/sig node |
/ok-to-test |
/retest |
@mtaufen Please can you give us an update on this PR? |
@ixdy Please can we have an update on this PR? |
We need to resolve the discussion in #48677. At the very least you need to engage more people in discussing this API change. Start with the ones I @-mentioned on that issue. |
@thockin @lavalamp @smarterclayton @devin-donnelly Please can you have a look at this PR and the related discussion and provide some feedback as to whether it is good to proceed? |
/retest |
/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kops-aws |
/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-etcd3 |
/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kops-aws |
/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-etcd3 |
/retest |
/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce |
00fe053
to
fbb6747
Compare
/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kops-aws |
/test pull-kubernetes-integration |
fbb6747
to
b2d4426
Compare
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: kevtaylor, msau42, saad-ali, yujuhong The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
And yet not enough to motivate someone to type |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
@saad-ali Please add milestone |
Has there been a security review of this PR? I'm concerned that it was written before our security subpath fixes in March. |
Based on discussion from SIG-Storage channel on Slack:
As such, adding milestone. /milestone v1.11 |
/priority important-soon |
[MILESTONENOTIFIER] Milestone Pull Request: Up-to-date for process @jsafrane @kevtaylor @msau42 @mtaufen @smarterclayton Pull Request Labels
|
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 58920, 58327, 60577, 49388, 62306). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here. |
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close that issue when PR gets merged): fixes #48677Special notes for your reviewer:
Release note: