Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automated cherry pick of #79451: kubelet: retry pod sandbox creation when containers were #79483

Conversation

yujuhong
Copy link
Contributor

Cherry pick of #79451 on release-1.14.

#79451: kubelet: retry pod sandbox creation when containers were

If kubelet never gets past sandbox creation (i.e., never attempted to
create containers for a pod), it should retry the sandbox creation on
failure, regardless of the restart policy of the pod.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved Indicates that a PR is not yet approved to merge into a release branch. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. area/kubelet sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Jun 27, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: yujuhong

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 27, 2019
@yujuhong yujuhong added this to the v1.14 milestone Jun 27, 2019
@yujuhong yujuhong added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now. labels Jun 27, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. labels Jun 27, 2019
@yujuhong
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @dashpole

@yujuhong
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @aleksandra-malinowska
/assign @tpepper

@dashpole
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 27, 2019
@hoegaarden hoegaarden added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Jun 28, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved Indicates that a PR is not yet approved to merge into a release branch. label Jun 28, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 55bca27 into kubernetes:release-1.14 Jun 28, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/kubelet cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants