-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove unused function from e2e framework rest.go #85119
Remove unused function from e2e framework rest.go #85119
Conversation
Hi @YuikoTakada. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
thanks @YuikoTakada |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: neolit123, YuikoTakada The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@YuikoTakada |
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
2 similar comments
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
@neolit123 thank you for your comment. I'd run it, but there is no change. Did I run in the wrong way...?? |
2c7a3a1
to
a5e32e5
Compare
looks like the PR needed to exclude some imports. |
it usually means calling |
@neolit123 thanks! I found a change in BUILD file after deleting some unnecessary imports and then running |
a5e32e5
to
e837a8b
Compare
/lgtm |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
This removes the following unused function:
Ref: #84380
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: