Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

expose: Use separate parameters for default and custom name #8804

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 29, 2015
Merged

expose: Use separate parameters for default and custom name #8804

merged 1 commit into from May 29, 2015

Conversation

0xmichalis
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented May 26, 2015

Can one of the admins verify that this patch is reasonable to test? (reply "ok to test", or if you trust the user, reply "add to whitelist")

If this message is too spammy, please complain @ixdy.

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

Can we get a simple test case?

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

ok to test

@0xmichalis
Copy link
Contributor Author

@smarterclayton can we get this merged?

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@smarterclayton smarterclayton added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 29, 2015
@rjnagal
Copy link
Contributor

rjnagal commented May 29, 2015

Travis came through. Integration timed out on shippable on one of the runs. LG, merging.

rjnagal added a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2015
expose: Use separate parameters for default and custom name
@rjnagal rjnagal merged commit 11268ba into kubernetes:master May 29, 2015
@0xmichalis 0xmichalis deleted the expose-default-name-param branch May 30, 2015 00:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants