Add links between Securing a Cluster and Security Checklist for alignment

[mrgiles]

Link documents Securing a Cluster (task) with Security Checklist (concept) for alignment. Fixes #37738

[mrgiles]

FYI @sftim

[Ritikaa96]

Hi @mrgiles Please note that the issue was mainly to align both pages advice for secure cluster. Refer to :

We should ensure that the advice in the two documents is aligned, and also make sure that the two documents link to each other.

Why is this needed
It's a bad idea to document multiple ways to make sure that your cluster is secure, unless those are well aligned.

I have not matched the pages but just wanted to add this as a reminder. Thanks for the contribution.

[Ritikaa96]

Also please check the reason for the checks being unsuccessful

[netlify]

✅ Pull request preview available for checking

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	19a3dc0
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-io-main-staging/deploys/644f5c4ce94c1500078c8201
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-40915--kubernetes-io-main-staging.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

[mrgiles]

Thanks @Ritikaa96, I just saw this note: #25119 (comment).
Where can I find this Hardening Guide @raesene?
What do you think @sftim, is it worth keeping the Securing a Cluster doc?

[sftim]

What do you think @sftim, is it worth keeping the Securing a Cluster doc?

It is, at least for now.

[raesene]

@mrgiles the hardening guide is still in development, definitely not one to link to at the moment :)

[mrgiles]

@sftim @tengqm, @Ritikaa96 , I'm afraid I need a little extra guidance to continue working on this issue. I'd like to know if you have a suggestion on how I should proceed to solve the problem. I'm really new to this so that's why I'm requesting a little extra help here. Thanks!

[tengqm]

/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: tengqm

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• content/en/OWNERS [tengqm]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[mrgiles]

Hi @tengqm, thank you for your review. If you think that the changes satisfy the requirements in #37738, could you also add an lgtm label for the PR to proceed? Thanks!

[mrgiles]

/assign @tengqm

[mrgiles]

@tengqm please disregard the adding the lgtm label comment. Thanks!

[mrgiles]

/assign @sftim

[reylejano]

/lgtm

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 32a260cb5294ff47e6fa56798c5976e8a8ca6f78