Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bump kubevirtci #11575

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 24, 2024
Merged

Bump kubevirtci #11575

merged 1 commit into from Apr 24, 2024

Conversation

kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot commented Mar 22, 2024 •
edited

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. size/XS labels Mar 22, 2024
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the sig/buildsystem Denotes an issue or PR that relates to changes in the build system. label Mar 22, 2024
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot force-pushed the bump-kubevirtci branch 5 times, most recently from 2f96e47 to 08cb5f7 Compare March 25, 2024 00:00
brianmcarey
brianmcarey reviewed Mar 25, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@brianmcarey brianmcarey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

/cc @xpivarc

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 25, 2024
@brianmcarey
Copy link
Member

/lgtm cancel

To allow more updates from kubevirtci to be added

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 27, 2024
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot force-pushed the bump-kubevirtci branch 3 times, most recently from 0b6e280 to a5c9573 Compare March 28, 2024 12:01
brianmcarey
brianmcarey reviewed Mar 28, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@brianmcarey brianmcarey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 28, 2024
xpivarc
xpivarc reviewed Apr 9, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@xpivarc xpivarc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: xpivarc

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 9, 2024
@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

Required labels detected, running phase 2 presubmits:
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-windows2016
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-kind-1.27-vgpu
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-kind-sriov
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.29-ipv6-sig-network
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.27-sig-network
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.27-sig-storage
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.27-sig-compute
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.27-sig-operator
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.28-sig-network
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.28-sig-storage
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.28-sig-compute
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.28-sig-operator

@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

3 similar comments
@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

1 similar comment
@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@dhiller
Copy link
Contributor

dhiller commented Apr 19, 2024

IDK what is wrong here, but retesting seems wrong at this point.

/hold

Let's investigate this.

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 19, 2024
@dhiller
Copy link
Contributor

dhiller commented Apr 19, 2024

Hm, at this point all lanes succeeded (acknowledging that they don't look very stable), except for one failure in the 1.28 lane related to NUMA

@dhiller
Copy link
Contributor

dhiller commented Apr 22, 2024

/unhold

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 22, 2024
@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@brianmcarey
Copy link
Member

/lgtm cancel

To allow the automation to update to the latest

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 23, 2024
@brianmcarey
Copy link
Member

/approve cancel

@brianmcarey brianmcarey removed the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 23, 2024
@kubevirt-bot
Bump kubevirtci
1e06a76 
[8f203b9 Automatic bump of CentOS Stream to latest](kubevirt/kubevirtci#1181)
[5d854e0 centos9: Add --numa support to vm.sh](kubevirt/kubevirtci#1174)
[73b90a3 Run bazelisk run //robots/cmd/kubevirtci-bumper:kubevirtci-bumper -- -ensure-last-three-minor-of v1 --k8s-provider-dir /home/prow/go/src/github.com/kubevirt/project-infra/../kubevirtci/cluster-provision/k8s](kubevirt/kubevirtci#1175)
[1c58677 Remove NoSchedule taints for control-planes as well as masters](kubevirt/kubevirtci#1173)
[9d50baf Automatic bump of CentOS Stream to latest](kubevirt/kubevirtci#1168)
[ef69592 Bump alpine to 3.19](kubevirt/kubevirtci#1167)
[4c6d7c7 Add AAQ Operator as an optional cluster addon](kubevirt/kubevirtci#1170)
[d69cd4e Automatic bump of CentOS Stream to latest](kubevirt/kubevirtci#1166)
[62457f2 Automatic bump of CentOS Stream to latest](kubevirt/kubevirtci#1162)
[85d8a72 centos: Update centos stream base to 20240318.0](kubevirt/kubevirtci#1161)
[970d172 Bump github.com/docker/docker in /cluster-provision/gocli](kubevirt/kubevirtci#1159)

```release-note
NONE
```

Signed-off-by: kubevirt-bot <kubevirtbot@redhat.com>
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/M and removed size/XS labels Apr 23, 2024
brianmcarey
brianmcarey reviewed Apr 23, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@brianmcarey brianmcarey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 23, 2024
@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

Required labels detected, running phase 2 presubmits:
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-windows2016
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-kind-1.27-vgpu
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-kind-sriov
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.29-ipv6-sig-network
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.27-sig-network
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.27-sig-storage
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.27-sig-compute
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.27-sig-operator
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.28-sig-network
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.28-sig-storage
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.28-sig-compute
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.28-sig-operator

@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

2 similar comments
@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@brianmcarey brianmcarey mentioned this pull request Apr 24, 2024
Draft
8 tasks
@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot merged commit b740331 into kubevirt:main Apr 24, 2024
36 of 37 checks passed
@dhiller
Copy link
Contributor

dhiller commented Apr 24, 2024

@zhlhahaha hey, did you see that the conformance test lane is failing all the time recently? Example from this PR: https://prow.ci.kubevirt.io/view/gs/kubevirt-prow/pr-logs/pull/kubevirt_kubevirt/11575/pull-kubevirt-conformance-arm64/1782794360010575872

@zhlhahaha
Copy link
Contributor

@zhlhahaha hey, did you see that the conformance test lane is failing all the time recently? Example from this PR: https://prow.ci.kubevirt.io/view/gs/kubevirt-prow/pr-logs/pull/kubevirt_kubevirt/11575/pull-kubevirt-conformance-arm64/1782794360010575872

Thanks for informing, I will take a look.

@zhlhahaha
Copy link
Contributor

@zhlhahaha hey, did you see that the conformance test lane is failing all the time recently? Example from this PR: https://prow.ci.kubevirt.io/view/gs/kubevirt-prow/pr-logs/pull/kubevirt_kubevirt/11575/pull-kubevirt-conformance-arm64/1782794360010575872

Hi, @dhiller it should work fine now. https://prow.ci.kubevirt.io/?job=pull-kubevirt-conformance-arm64

@iholder101 iholder101 mentioned this pull request Apr 25, 2024
Open
8 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@brianmcarey brianmcarey brianmcarey left review comments

@xpivarc xpivarc xpivarc left review comments

@dhiller dhiller dhiller approved these changes

@acardace acardace Awaiting requested review from acardace

@enp0s3 enp0s3 Awaiting requested review from enp0s3

Assignees

@dhiller dhiller

@brianmcarey brianmcarey

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/buildsystem Denotes an issue or PR that relates to changes in the build system. size/M
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
6 participants
@kubevirt-bot @brianmcarey @kubevirt-commenter-bot @dhiller @zhlhahaha @xpivarc