Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Drop the sorted distinction in transcribe? #30

Closed
laforge49 opened this issue Nov 16, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Drop the sorted distinction in transcribe? #30

laforge49 opened this issue Nov 16, 2015 · 2 comments
Labels
question

Comments

@laforge49
Copy link
Owner

Things would be a lot more convenient in transcribe if we did not distinguish between hash and sorted sets and maps. I'll note EDN nodes not.
@laforge49
Copy link
Owner Author

Another advantage here is that we can serialize transactions using edn and when processing updates any maps get converted back to sorted maps. Without this change we can not use edn for serialization!

@laforge49
Copy link
Owner Author

Done. Wiki also updated: https://github.com/laforge49/aatree/wiki/Transcription

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
question
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@laforge49