-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pre-trained model shows low performance #20
Comments
@laughtervv Can you share the list of training data? |
Hi @KosukeArase ,I'm confused about how to write the "data/train_hdf5_file_list.txt".Is it like the file "filename.txt" given by @laughtervv ? I rename "filename.txt" to "train_hdf5_file_list.txt" to run train.py. But this caused my computer to be full of memory and eventually crashed. How can I get a start? |
Hi @lhiceu |
Thanks for your reply! @KosukeArase |
Hi @lhiceu @KosukeArase |
@SinestroEdmonce |
@SinestroEdmonce
|
@lhiceu |
Hi @lhiceu |
hello,have you resolve the problem——“Which dataset did you use to do the testing, ModelNet40, ShapeNet or ScanNet?”.I'm confusing about this program and meet the same trouble . |
Hi @laughtervv
Thank you for open sourcing your great work!
I downloaded your pre-trained model from here (the link in README) and your h5 data from here (the link in issue#3) and used
pergroup_thres.txt
andmingroupsize.txt
in issue#8.However, I ran test.py using them and got mAP 0.47, this is lower than the mAP reported in your paper (mAP 0.5435).
Did I make some mistakes?
Here is the result I got. Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: