Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider an APV flag w/ provenance #82

Open
lcorcodilos opened this issue Nov 14, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Consider an APV flag w/ provenance #82

lcorcodilos opened this issue Nov 14, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@lcorcodilos
Copy link
Owner

2016 data and MC can be marked for different chunks.

  • For data, the "HIPM" indication is in the DAS path and is the first chunk of data from B to part of F (F is split into two sets - one with HIPM and one without).
  • For MC, the "preVFP" and "postVFP" strings are used to denote the simulations of the two different detector conditions in 2016. The "preVFP" aligns with "HIPM" and "postVFP" aligns with no "HIPM". The samples with the VFP also have "NanoAODv9APV" - APV a third acronym for the same effect.
  • The pileup is denoted with preVFP and postVFP plus a version with neither (unclear what this version is - an average?)
  • The JECs are denoted with APV.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant