Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat(topology/algebra): Inf and inducing preserve compatibility with algebraic structure #11720

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

ADedecker
Copy link
Member

This partly duplicates @mariainesdff 's work on group topologies, but I'm using an unbundled approach which avoids defining a new X_topology structure for each interesting X.


Open in Gitpod

@ADedecker ADedecker added the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Jan 29, 2022
Copy link
Member

@fpvandoorn fpvandoorn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Without investigating very deeply, I think in earlier commits you had two problems:

  • You were putting multiple topological_group instances on the same type, which is never a good idea
  • I think type-class inference cannot deal with hypotheses of the form [∀ t ∈ ts, @topological_group G t _]. Note that this depends on a hypothesis (H : t ∈ ts) which cannot be figured out itself by type-class inference.

These lemmas are fine, and can locally be used with haveI/letI.

One minor comment, otherwise, LGTM

bors d+

src/topology/algebra/mul_action.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Feb 1, 2022

✌️ ADedecker can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with bors r+. More detailed instructions are available here.

@leanprover-community-bot-assistant leanprover-community-bot-assistant added delegated The PR author may merge after reviewing final suggestions. and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Feb 1, 2022
@ADedecker
Copy link
Member Author

bors r+

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2022
…algebraic structure (#11720)

This partly duplicates @mariainesdff 's work on group topologies, but I'm using an unbundled approach which avoids defining a new `X_topology` structure for each interesting X.
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Feb 4, 2022

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title feat(topology/algebra): Inf and inducing preserve compatibility with algebraic structure [Merged by Bors] - feat(topology/algebra): Inf and inducing preserve compatibility with algebraic structure Feb 4, 2022
@bors bors bot closed this Feb 4, 2022
@bors bors bot deleted the AD_top_lattice_algebra branch February 4, 2022 00:32
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2022
…2058)

When working on #11720 I forgot that we have to deal with Prop-indexed infimums quite often, so this PR fixes that.
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
delegated The PR author may merge after reviewing final suggestions.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants