-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 297
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - chore(order/{complete_lattice,sup_indep}): move complete_lattice.independent
#12588
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This makes `complete_lattice.independent` easier to work with in the degenerate case.
…ependent` to be beside `finset.sup_indep` Putting this here means that in future we can talk about `pairwise_disjoint` at the same time, which was previously defined downstream of `complete_lattice.independent`. This commit only moves existing declarations and adjusts module docstrings.
1 task
This PR/issue depends on: |
…e_lattice.independent_pair
…c-wieser/move-complete_lattice.independent
YaelDillies
approved these changes
Mar 15, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All good!
…mplete_lattice.independent
jcommelin
approved these changes
Mar 21, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks 🎉
bors merge
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2022
…ependent` (#12588) Putting this here means that in future we can talk about `pairwise_disjoint` at the same time, which was previously defined downstream of `complete_lattice.independent`. This commit only moves existing declarations and adjusts module docstrings. The new authorship comes from #5971 and #7199, which predate this file.
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
complete_lattice.independent
complete_lattice.independent
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge
All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Putting this here means that in future we can talk about
pairwise_disjoint
at the same time, which was previously defined downstream ofcomplete_lattice.independent
.This commit only moves existing declarations and adjusts module docstrings.
The new authorship comes from #5971 and #7199, which predate this file.
complete_lattice.independent_pair
#12565