[Merged by Bors] - feat(order/sup_indep): lemmas about pairwise and set.pairwise
#12590
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
eric-wieser
added
awaiting-review
leanprover-community-bot-assistant
added
the
merge-conflict
leanprover-community-bot-assistant
removed
the
blocked-by-other-PR
|
This PR/issue depends on: |
leanprover-community-bot-assistant
removed
the
merge-conflict
eric-wieser
force-pushed
the
eric-wieser/complete_lattice.independent.pairwise
branch
from
5137e1e
to
fd09382
Compare
eric-wieser
changed the title
set.pairwisepairwise and set.pairwise
Co-authored-by: Yaël Dillies <yael.dillies@gmail.com>
|
Thanks! bors merge |
github-actions
bot
added
ready-to-merge
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2022
…2590) The `disjoint` lemmas can now be stated in terms of these two `pairwise` definitions. This wasn't previously possible as these definitions were not yet imported. This also adds the `iff` versions of these lemmas, and a docstring tying them all together.
|
Build failed: |
…e_lattice.independent.pairwise
|
bors merge |
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2022
…2590) The `disjoint` lemmas can now be stated in terms of these two `pairwise` definitions. This wasn't previously possible as these definitions were not yet imported. This also adds the `iff` versions of these lemmas, and a docstring tying them all together.
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
bors
bot
changed the title
pairwise and set.pairwisepairwise and set.pairwise
jjaassoonn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 7, 2022
…2590) The `disjoint` lemmas can now be stated in terms of these two `pairwise` definitions. This wasn't previously possible as these definitions were not yet imported. This also adds the `iff` versions of these lemmas, and a docstring tying them all together.
jjaassoonn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 7, 2022
…2590) The `disjoint` lemmas can now be stated in terms of these two `pairwise` definitions. This wasn't previously possible as these definitions were not yet imported. This also adds the `iff` versions of these lemmas, and a docstring tying them all together.
jjaassoonn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 7, 2022
…2590) The `disjoint` lemmas can now be stated in terms of these two `pairwise` definitions. This wasn't previously possible as these definitions were not yet imported. This also adds the `iff` versions of these lemmas, and a docstring tying them all together.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
disjointlemmas can now be stated in terms of these twopairwisedefinitions.This wasn't previously possible as these definitions were not yet imported.
This also adds the
iffversions of these lemmas, and a docstring tying them all together.complete_lattice.independent#12588