chore(data/nat/basic): remove pos_iff_ne_zero' #1610
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This used to be different from pos_iff_ne_zero because the latter was phrased in terms of `n > 0`, not `0 < n`. Since #1436 they are the same.
jcommelin
approved these changes
Oct 24, 2019
jcommelin
added
the
ready-to-merge
anrddh
pushed a commit
to anrddh/mathlib
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2020
…1610) This used to be different from pos_iff_ne_zero because the latter was phrased in terms of `n > 0`, not `0 < n`. Since leanprover-community#1436 they are the same.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This used to be different from pos_iff_ne_zero because the latter
was phrased in terms of
n > 0, not0 < n. Since #1436 theyare the same.
TO CONTRIBUTORS:
Make sure you have:
If this PR is related to a discussion on Zulip, please include a link in the discussion.
For reviewers: code review check list