Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(*): use ne_ instead of neq_ in lemma names #1878

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jan 15, 2020
Merged

chore(*): use ne_ instead of neq_ in lemma names #1878

merged 2 commits into from Jan 15, 2020

Conversation

urkud
Copy link
Member

@urkud urkud commented Jan 14, 2020

One exception: mem_sets_of_neq_bot is now mem_sets_of_eq_bot
because it has an equality as an assumption.

Also add filter.infi_ne_bot_(iff_?)of_directed' with a different
nonempty assumption, and use it to simplify the proof of
lift_ne_bot_iff.

TO CONTRIBUTORS:

Make sure you have:

  • reviewed and applied the coding style: coding, naming
  • reviewed and applied the documentation requirements
  • make sure definitions and lemmas are put in the right files
  • make sure definitions and lemmas are not redundant

If this PR is related to a discussion on Zulip, please include a link in the discussion.

For reviewers: code review check list

One exception: `mem_sets_of_neq_bot` is now `mem_sets_of_eq_bot`
because it has an equality as an assumption.

Also add `filter.infi_ne_bot_(iff_?)of_directed'` with a different
`nonempty` assumption, and use it to simplify the proof of
`lift_ne_bot_iff`.
@sgouezel sgouezel added the ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) label Jan 15, 2020
@sgouezel sgouezel self-requested a review January 15, 2020 13:24
@mergify mergify bot merged commit b3ed6e6 into master Jan 15, 2020
@mergify mergify bot deleted the neq-ne branch January 15, 2020 15:05
anrddh pushed a commit to anrddh/mathlib that referenced this pull request May 15, 2020
…unity#1878)

One exception: `mem_sets_of_neq_bot` is now `mem_sets_of_eq_bot`
because it has an equality as an assumption.

Also add `filter.infi_ne_bot_(iff_?)of_directed'` with a different
`nonempty` assumption, and use it to simplify the proof of
`lift_ne_bot_iff`.

Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
anrddh pushed a commit to anrddh/mathlib that referenced this pull request May 16, 2020
…unity#1878)

One exception: `mem_sets_of_neq_bot` is now `mem_sets_of_eq_bot`
because it has an equality as an assumption.

Also add `filter.infi_ne_bot_(iff_?)of_directed'` with a different
`nonempty` assumption, and use it to simplify the proof of
`lift_ne_bot_iff`.

Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants