Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(order/filter/basic): redefine filter.pure #1889

Merged
merged 8 commits into from Jan 26, 2020
Merged

Conversation

urkud
Copy link
Member

@urkud urkud commented Jan 17, 2020

New definition has s ∈ pure a definitionally equal to a ∈ s.

TO CONTRIBUTORS:

Make sure you have:

  • reviewed and applied the coding style: coding, naming
  • reviewed and applied the documentation requirements
  • make sure definitions and lemmas are put in the right files
  • make sure definitions and lemmas are not redundant

If this PR is related to a discussion on Zulip, please include a link in the discussion.

For reviewers: code review check list

New definition has `s ∈ pure a` definitionally equal to `a ∈ s`.
@urkud urkud added the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Jan 21, 2020
src/order/filter/basic.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/order/filter/basic.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/topology/stone_cech.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@gebner
Copy link
Member

gebner commented Jan 21, 2020

Looks good to me aside from the minor stuff. I have no opinion on changing the definition of filter.pure, but extracting pure_inj, etc., is great.

Co-Authored-By: Gabriel Ebner <gebner@gebner.org>
@sgouezel sgouezel added awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Jan 21, 2020
@urkud urkud added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR and removed awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes labels Jan 25, 2020
@sgouezel sgouezel added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Jan 26, 2020
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 587b312 into master Jan 26, 2020
@mergify mergify bot deleted the filter-pure-def branch January 26, 2020 19:37
anrddh pushed a commit to anrddh/mathlib that referenced this pull request May 15, 2020
…unity#1889)

* refactor(order/filter/basic): redefine `filter.pure`

New definition has `s ∈ pure a` definitionally equal to `a ∈ s`.

* Update src/order/filter/basic.lean

Co-Authored-By: Gabriel Ebner <gebner@gebner.org>

* Minor fixes suggested by @gebner

* Fix compile

* Update src/order/filter/basic.lean

Co-authored-by: Gabriel Ebner <gebner@gebner.org>
Co-authored-by: sgouezel <sebastien.gouezel@univ-rennes1.fr>
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
anrddh pushed a commit to anrddh/mathlib that referenced this pull request May 16, 2020
…unity#1889)

* refactor(order/filter/basic): redefine `filter.pure`

New definition has `s ∈ pure a` definitionally equal to `a ∈ s`.

* Update src/order/filter/basic.lean

Co-Authored-By: Gabriel Ebner <gebner@gebner.org>

* Minor fixes suggested by @gebner

* Fix compile

* Update src/order/filter/basic.lean

Co-authored-by: Gabriel Ebner <gebner@gebner.org>
Co-authored-by: sgouezel <sebastien.gouezel@univ-rennes1.fr>
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants