Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(order/bounds): use dot notation, reorder, prove more properties #2028

Merged
merged 8 commits into from Feb 25, 2020

Conversation

urkud
Copy link
Member

@urkud urkud commented Feb 20, 2020

Also make parts of complete_lattice and
conditionally_complete_lattice use these lemmas.

Please review order/bounds as a new file. It will be easier than analysing the diff.
Needs a module docstring.

TO CONTRIBUTORS:

Make sure you have:

  • reviewed and applied the coding style: coding, naming
  • reviewed and applied the documentation requirements
  • for tactics:
  • make sure definitions and lemmas are put in the right files
  • make sure definitions and lemmas are not redundant

If this PR is related to a discussion on Zulip, please include a link in the discussion.

For reviewers: code review check list

Also make parts of `complete_lattice` and
`conditionally_complete_lattice` use these lemmas.
@urkud urkud added the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Feb 21, 2020
Copy link
Collaborator

@sgouezel sgouezel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks really great, thanks!

src/order/bounds.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/order/bounds.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/order/bounds.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/order/bounds.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@urkud urkud added awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Feb 23, 2020
@urkud urkud added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR and removed awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes labels Feb 25, 2020
src/order/bounds.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/order/bounds.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@sgouezel sgouezel added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Feb 25, 2020
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 450dcdf into master Feb 25, 2020
@mergify mergify bot deleted the bounds-rewrite branch February 25, 2020 14:17
@urkud urkud mentioned this pull request Mar 18, 2020
7 tasks
anrddh pushed a commit to anrddh/mathlib that referenced this pull request May 15, 2020
…ies (leanprover-community#2028)

* refactor(order/bounds): use dot notation, prove more properties

Also make parts of `complete_lattice` and
`conditionally_complete_lattice` use these lemmas.

* Comments

* Add a module docstring

* Fixes from review, +4 lemmas about images

* Fix a typo in the previous commit

* Update src/order/bounds.lean

* Update src/order/bounds.lean

Co-authored-by: sgouezel <sebastien.gouezel@univ-rennes1.fr>
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
anrddh pushed a commit to anrddh/mathlib that referenced this pull request May 16, 2020
…ies (leanprover-community#2028)

* refactor(order/bounds): use dot notation, prove more properties

Also make parts of `complete_lattice` and
`conditionally_complete_lattice` use these lemmas.

* Comments

* Add a module docstring

* Fixes from review, +4 lemmas about images

* Fix a typo in the previous commit

* Update src/order/bounds.lean

* Update src/order/bounds.lean

Co-authored-by: sgouezel <sebastien.gouezel@univ-rennes1.fr>
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants