Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(data/real/ennreal): weaker assumptions in sub_mul, add coe_inv_le #2074

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 2, 2020

Conversation

urkud
Copy link
Member

@urkud urkud commented Mar 2, 2020

TO CONTRIBUTORS:

Make sure you have:

  • reviewed and applied the coding style: coding, naming
  • reviewed and applied the documentation requirements
  • for tactics:
  • make sure definitions and lemmas are put in the right files
  • make sure definitions and lemmas are not redundant

If this PR is related to a discussion on Zulip, please include a link in the discussion.

For reviewers: code review check list

@sgouezel sgouezel added the ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) label Mar 2, 2020
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 62756bd into master Mar 2, 2020
@mergify mergify bot deleted the ennreal-lemmas branch March 2, 2020 16:20
anrddh pushed a commit to anrddh/mathlib that referenced this pull request May 15, 2020
…nv_le` (leanprover-community#2074)

Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
anrddh pushed a commit to anrddh/mathlib that referenced this pull request May 16, 2020
…nv_le` (leanprover-community#2074)

Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants