-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 299
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(measurable_space): is_measurable_supr lemma #2092
Conversation
I don't know really well this part of the library (in general, I use a fixed measurable structure). These lemmas seem perfectly reasonable and useful, but I am not convinced they should be simp lemmas. Do you have a specific application in mind? |
I wanted these because I was thinking about proving a theorem of Kolmogorov on the way to constructing the Wiener process. If you have a measure on a function space A key step of the proof is that the measurable structure on a function space is the one generated by the evaluation maps at points of x, and so in particular the cylinder sets generate the measurable sets. So I needed to be able to describe that generated measurable structure, and this is what these lemmas do. |
I agree, nevertheless, that they needn't be simp lemmas, at least for now. I'll fix that. |
The Kolmogorov extension theorem is definitely a worthy goal. I am not sure it is the best way to construct the Wiener measure, though, as it gives a measure which is not supported on continuous functions while there is a version of the Wiener measure which is (and for which one can use the sigma-algebra coming from the topology of locally uniform convergence). |
…y#2092) * feat(data/set/lattice): add @[simp] to lemmas * feat(measurable_space): is_measurable_supr lemma * fix proof * fix proof * fix proof * oops * fix proofs * typo in doc string * remove @[simp] Co-authored-by: sgouezel <sebastien.gouezel@univ-rennes1.fr> Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…y#2092) * feat(data/set/lattice): add @[simp] to lemmas * feat(measurable_space): is_measurable_supr lemma * fix proof * fix proof * fix proof * oops * fix proofs * typo in doc string * remove @[simp] Co-authored-by: sgouezel <sebastien.gouezel@univ-rennes1.fr> Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
(Builds on #2091)
Three lemmas describing
is_measurable
on various suprema of measurable spaces. All are written in terms of the inductive predicategenerate_measurable
, which may be morally wrong.If someone who loves galois connections more than I do wants to tell me that wanting these lemmas is surely a sign that I'm doing it wrong, I'm happy to learn. :-)
But for now it's hard to get access to this information.