New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - feat(set): preliminaries for Haar measure #3189
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
results on sets and finsets
some changes:
|
@fpvandoorn please put (at least) the name changes in the top post above the |
Good idea! Done. |
jcommelin
reviewed
Jun 26, 2020
semorrison
reviewed
Jun 26, 2020
Otherwise, LGTM. |
This was referenced Jun 27, 2020
bryangingechen
added
the
awaiting-review
The author would like community review of the PR
label
Jun 27, 2020
bors r+ |
github-actions
bot
added
ready-to-merge
All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
and removed
awaiting-review
The author would like community review of the PR
labels
Jun 27, 2020
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 27, 2020
`comp_sup_eq_sup_comp` is renamed `comp_sup_eq_sup_comp_of_is_total` and there is a new version that doesn't assume that the order is linear. `set.image_injective` is renamed `function.injective.image_injective` (in the same way as the existing `function.surjective.preimage_injective`). `set.image_injective` is now an `iff`.
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
bors
bot
changed the title
feat(set): preliminaries for Haar measure
[Merged by Bors] - feat(set): preliminaries for Haar measure
Jun 27, 2020
fpvandoorn
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 5, 2020
In #3189 I removed it, which was a mistake
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 6, 2020
In #3189 I removed it, which was a mistake.
cipher1024
pushed a commit
to cipher1024/mathlib
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2022
`comp_sup_eq_sup_comp` is renamed `comp_sup_eq_sup_comp_of_is_total` and there is a new version that doesn't assume that the order is linear. `set.image_injective` is renamed `function.injective.image_injective` (in the same way as the existing `function.surjective.preimage_injective`). `set.image_injective` is now an `iff`.
cipher1024
pushed a commit
to cipher1024/mathlib
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2022
…rover-community#3293) In leanprover-community#3189 I removed it, which was a mistake.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge
All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
comp_sup_eq_sup_comp
is renamedcomp_sup_eq_sup_comp_of_is_total
and there is a new version that doesn't assume that the order is linear.set.image_injective
is renamedfunction.injective.image_injective
(in the same way as the existingfunction.surjective.preimage_injective
).set.image_injective
is now aniff
.PR 1/5(?) to put the Haar measure in mathlib. This PR: results about (fin)sets