This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2024. It is now read-only.
[Merged by Bors] - feat(group_theory/subgroup): Add decidable_mem_range #5371
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This means that `fintype (quotient_group.quotient f.range)` can be found by type-class resolution.
eric-wieser
added
the
awaiting-review
2 tasks
eric-wieser
added
the
easy
|
LGTM bors merge |
github-actions
bot
added
ready-to-merge
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2020
This means that `fintype (quotient_group.quotient f.range)` can be found by type-class resolution.
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
bors
bot
changed the title
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This means that
fintype (quotient_group.quotient f.range)can be found by type-class resolution.Note that to actually be useful for quotients this also needs #5368, but it is fine for them to be merged in either order.