-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 311
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - Feat: Add Yang-Baxter equation and the opposite braided monoidal category #10415
Closed
Closed
Changes from 18 commits
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2a448dc
Add braided opposites, yang-baxter equation
Shamrock-Frost e6398ef
Fix definition of braided opposite, add reference for definition
Shamrock-Frost ed70541
Add doc strings, symmetric monoidal lemmas
Shamrock-Frost a6b1d07
Make focusing use the right dot
Shamrock-Frost 482c065
Make references linter happy
Shamrock-Frost b5ca302
Move operators to end of line
Shamrock-Frost 7627859
Fix whitespace
Shamrock-Frost 1fa39b2
Implement PR suggestions
Shamrock-Frost 68dd1f7
Add reassoc attributes & clean up YB proof
Shamrock-Frost b7015e4
Implement suggestions on PR
Shamrock-Frost ac0ae4d
Add lots of simp lemmas to help with automation
Shamrock-Frost aa3240c
Reverse whiskerLeftIso_symm, whiskerRightIso_symm
Shamrock-Frost 85ec0e2
Move = from start of rhs to end of lhs in yang_baxter_iso
Shamrock-Frost cae92ff
Clean up reverseBraiding proofs
Shamrock-Frost 3f1b153
Remove superfluous parentheses
Shamrock-Frost bec03ff
Clean up proofs
Shamrock-Frost 2f29439
Simplify `equivReverseBraiding`
Shamrock-Frost 121d8e1
Remove underscores from names
Shamrock-Frost cf5da65
Move operator to end of previous line
Shamrock-Frost File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there some reasons why you put associators at the both ends in the RHS? I think this is one possible choice, but we also have other choices.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, I meant LHS, not RHS.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I chose this way of writing it because it becomes an equality of maps
X ⊗ Y ⊗ Z ⟶ Z ⊗ Y ⊗ X
, both the domain and codomain being fully right associated. Also because it's what was easiest for the proof of associativity inmopBraidedFunctor
. There are other choices we could make but I don't see a reason to prefer another